A logo is an image that is supposed to be the representation of an organization. The logo’s job is to give off the same energy you would want people to receive when you describe the company or organization it represents.

That being said, it is quite astonishing that there are actually people out there that are willing, and more importantly bold enough to, post a logo design job somewhere in the price range of $100. Some even are bold enough to disrespect the creative community even more by going as low as $50, some lower than that. You can almost guarantee only bad logos will come out of that venture.

The designers that accept these quite disrespectful jobs can’t be fully faulted here, quite frankly they just don’t know any better. For the most part, the people taking these demeaning jobs are either young starving designers on their last dollar with no solid client in sight, a relative of the person posting who plays around in Adobe Photoshop Elements every now and then, or they were daring enough to take it into their own hands after getting no responses.

This treatment of  logo design is of course going to lead to the inevitable lower creative standards set for this creative practice. With a key creative field being demeaned every day, a client base for this field with an ‘ignorance is bliss’ mindset, and swarms of people claiming falsely to be designers, what is there for real professional creatives to do?

Well, taking a note from Hollywood, how about the celebration of just how awful these logos are? We spend so much time celebrating how good logos can be, and appreciating the expertise displayed in some, that we forget how wrong a logo can go in our bubble. That is why in this post you will see an array of awful and poorly designed logos.

*Disclaimer: Positions can easily be switched with the bad logos listed here. Once you start getting so bad, they kinda all can just be grouped.

Editor’s note: Razzie is “the foremost authority on all things that suck on the big screen.” source

Top 30 Bad Logos Chart: Corporate Logo Fails

30. Kraft Foods

Kraft Foods Bad Logos Example

Kraft Foods, its a carnival in your mouth.

29. NYC Taxi

New York City is considered a cultural hub of the world with an incomparable art and design community. This is really the logo they settled on for their taxi company?

28. Bing

Remember back in 2009 when almost every typography lover ripped this logo to shreds? Sometimes one has to wonder if Microsoft is just doing this on purpose.

27. A Style

Wow, the wonders of all the imagination that can go into the letter A’s letter form. Definitely a bad logo example.

26. Locum

Locum is a Swedish property management company.

25. Verizon

Here one may see a top telecommunications company. Another may see a big red V that looks out of place, and a text that is less than interesting. Your probably the latter.

24. NSW Government

Now this is definitely the logo of a governing body I can trust.

23. MSN

This is a good example of when redesigning a logo, taking things away can and will lead to bad results if done inappropriately.

22. Comprehensive Health Care

I do believe we just walked in on this home while it was undressing…. Shame on us…

21. London Olympics 2012

Its kinda hard not to see the little girl on her computer. Maybe she is designing a better logo.

20. PathMark


19. Aldershot & Farnborough Twins & Triplets Club

Once again we have a child being placed in a position that just screams inappropriate.

18. Pepsi

You can never accuse Pepsi of giving falsely advertising to the public what the effects can be from drinking their soda.

17. Bureau of Health Promotions

I wonder exactly what type of health they are trying to promote here…

16. GAP 2010

Remember a little over a year ago when GAP changed its iconic logo, to, well, this and completely shocked the world? While also providing great logo design roast material for the designer community? This logo takes the classical flavor that is gap, and degrades it to that of some common store you see in the plaza of your local supermarket.


Gotta give Paul Rand a designer’s pass on this one, I mean we all make mistakes. Legends may slip too.

14. American Pediatric Center

Well this position doesn’t seem compromising at all.

13. Office of Government Commerce

If the current global Occupy movement doesn’t illustrate how the people feel that government organizations could care less about its governed, then this logo sure takes care of that.

12. Dough Boys

With a logo like that, would you really want to get food from there???

11. Kudawara Pharmacy


10. Clinica Dental

That looks like a lot more going on than your regular cleaning if you ask me.

9. Hilton Worldwide

Alignment issues are one thing, but this level of bevel in a logo design is never acceptable.

8. The Detail Doctor

Based on the sketch of this car, seems like this doctor needs a better understanding of the word detail.

7. Portland Trail Blazers

So is this suppose to be a what a trail blazer looks like?

6. Mont-Sat

Um is that looking like a….. Yeah, that is exactly what it is.


I didn’t know there are parents aletting their young children go through with this serious operation. What is the world coming to?

4. Catholic Church’s Archdiocesan Youth Commission

Now this isn’t alluding to anything about the stereotypes how the Catholic Church treats young children. I mean it even won a design award….

3. The Computer Doctors

I know one thing, I don’t want them anywhere near my computer.

2. Institute of Oriental Studies

Maybe from another angle, nope still looks like well….. what it looks like. Hope no young children are in the room.

1. The Cleveland Browns

Is it me, or does it seem like this football team was just so lazy that they thought a football helmet would actually work? They could have just been cheap too.

13 Successful Corporate and Failed Bad Logos Designs

A company’s logo is the most powerful part of their corporate identity. Logos communicate with consumers and users on a personal level, affecting the market’s opinions towards the brand on a psychological level. Sometimes, logos need a makeover. It takes a lot of research to be able to execute a redesign of an old and familiar logo. Underdogs can get on top of the game because of their logo transformation and at the same time a major player can destroy themselves in just a short time. Here are a few of the most successful and not-so-successful logo redesigns. Let’s cover the good ones first.

Amazing Logo Redesigns

1. Kentucky Fried Chicken

Kentucky Fried Chicken, also known as KFC, is a chain of restaurants based in humble Louisville, Kentucky. The famous restaurant was founded by Colonel Harland Sanders. Colonel died in 1980 but still continues to be an important part of its branding and advertising strategy. The restaurant is most well-known for their famous fried chicken. KFC has changed its logo four times in forty years, and with each redesign it becomes more and more about Colonel Sanders.

The new logo is fresh, it’s distinctly new but it’s still all about the colonel. It made use of bolder colors and lines, so it’s more visually striking. Plus, the colonel has gotten rid of the stuffy suit and has put on a homey apron. The restaurant looks very friendly for the kids and the family. I think that the new logo can do without the KFC typeface, however.

2. Starbucks

Starbucks is a well-loved brand internationally, best known for their great coffee that is distinctly ‘Starbucks coffee’. This year Starbucks celebrated its 40th anniversary, and in commemoration unveiled a new logo. The iconic green siren is out of the circle, dropping the words ‘Starbucks Coffee’. The logo change is parallel to the company’s plan to expand their product line. They are already selling ice cream, and are planning to sell beer, wine and other products.

Some consumers were horrified about the logo change. Some preferred the old logo and didn’t quite understand why Starbucks’ took their name off the logo.

I am a big fan of the logo change. Starbucks’ logo is well-known all over the world. The distinct green, mermaid logo already speaks for itself; it doesn’t need to announce that it’s ‘Starbucks Coffee’. The new logo is streamlined, simple and elegant. It’s a great revamp; logo redesigns always get a lot of attention, and Starbucks was no exception.

3. Google

There is little change to the new Google logo, but I think it’s worth mentioning. When dealing with redesign, subtlety is always key. When you want a new look, you still need to relate it to its previous design so that the brand image is still easy to identify.

The colors are retained, and so is the Times New Roman-variant typography. Google removed other aspects that made it old-fashioned: obvious embossing and shadows. The exclamation point was also removed, which they initially added to mimic the Yahoo! logo. Now it is thinner, sleeker and more modern-looking than the previous logos. It’s clean, smooth and almost creamy.

No search engine is more fun and hip than Google–and that is partly because of the Google doodles which make the experience more enjoyable for users. Google doodles usually commemorate important holidays worldwide. Now, many get excited over the release of a doodle. Some even collect them! Some Google doodles seem to be random, but they actually commemorate important events like Jules Verne’s birthday, Children’s day, the beginning of Spring and even the 19th Anniversary of the 1st documented ice cream sundae!

4. San Diego Zoo

The San Diego Zoo is one of the most well-loved zoos in the United States. It is the largest in the world, housing more than 4,000 rare and endangered animals with 800 species and sub-species. The San Diego Zoo introduced a new branding identity created by Landor. It had a new identity, with a new tagline ‘Wild at Heart’.

This is one of the few cases wherein a total revamp of a company is strong and strikingly effective. This is the new era of the famous zoo, marked by a radical change from an uncreative logo to an interactive, child-friendly and totally new identity. The change is drastic, but it works because the new brand has a unified and strong point of view. It is more contemporary and speaks to the audience. It helps a lot that the execution is impeccable, too.

Photo by Under Consideration

5. Yellow Pages

One of the most unforgettable tag lines in the history of advertising was from Yellow Pages: Let your fingers do the walking. The old logo was the all too familiar ‘walking fingers’ through yellow pages logo. But with the dawn of the digital age, Yellow Pages are now on the verge of extinction. It’s now a great inconvenience to look for a phone number in a bulky phonebook. At the dawn of the digital age, Yellow Pages kept up by going digital; providing their services on a directory, mobile and online.

The new Yellow Pages has recently launched applications for the iPhone, Android and Blackberry. The new identity is modern. Instead of the boxy rectangle border, it was replaced by a sleek pebble shape. The walking fingers are still there, but the open book is gone. The former logo was no longer suitable for today’s times, so it was perfect timing for a new identity. This is the era where the company is moving away from the paper and into the digital age. It’s a smart move for the company to remain relevant.

Logo Transformations that Need Improvement

1. GAP

Let’s first cover the biggest company redesign mistake: Gap. They released their new logo last year, and it was a huge disaster. The old logo was well-loved and familiar to all, used for more than two decades. The dark blue square with the familiar serif white font was well-loved and familiar, almost homey.

Gap’s mistake was radically changing everything. The logo was designed by Laird & Partners, in the effort to create a more contemporary and modern expression. Personally I think the new logo is not great, it looks more like a clip art from Microsoft than a “contemporary, modern logo.” I was not alone in this opinion. There was a public outcry when it was released online, major backlash and criticism poured on Gap’s Facebook and Twitter page. Some harsh criticisms include: ‘looks like a child made it’, ‘a joke’ and ‘amateur’.

It only gets worse. Gap chose to remain silent about all the controversy, when they finally responded it added more fuel to the fire. Gap tried to handle its blunder by covering the whole thing up. Gap posted on their official Facebook page, thanking everyone for their input on the logo. They are ‘thrilled to see a passionate debate unfolding’, and asked the online community to share their designs. They ended the statement with: ‘we love our version but we would like to see other ideas’. People were laughing with disbelief over Gap’s response. They dismissed their error as a so-called social experiment, and still had the nerve to ask designs from others.

The story ends with Gap ditching their new logo, and returning to their old one. Gap president Marka Hansen was fired by execs weeks after the failed redesign episode. Moral of the story? Don’t mess with a well-loved brand and image valued at $4 billion. As the old adage says, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!

2. Kraft

Radical changes in logo design almost always imply that something is wrong with the company. Everything about the brand has been changed. From ‘KRAFT’ it became ‘kraft foods’. From an all caps, bold font to small caps in thin, sans-serif typography. A tagline ‘make today delicious’ is now attached to the new logo. More colors are added, instead of the distinct red and blue.

Let’s tackle the good parts first. the new Kraft logo is sleek, soft and more feminine. It looks fresher, maybe a move parallel to their decision to produce healthier products for the family. The old font was blocky, heavy and bold. Yes, Kraft seems to have gone the right direction. However, they should have taken cues from other brands that the radical changing of a logo can destroy the brand’s identity. It just looks like the old Kraft and the new Kraft Foods are totally different companies with totally different products offered.

Plus, don’t you think that the new Kraft logo looks eerily similar to the Yoplait logo?

3. MasterCard

MasterCard has reworked its corporate identity, changing the whole logo and name. It is now MasterCard Worldwide, no longer MasterCard International. The familiar red and yellow interlocking circles are replaced by a fluid, swirly, multi-layer logo. The objective of the repositioning is to show the public their intention to expand to newer markets worldwide. The two circles don’t interlock with the bars, but are connected by a third ring shared by both circles.

I am 50-50 about the logo, but I’m seeing the whole thing as more half-empty than half-full. The logo looks modern and up-to-date but there’s too much happening–too many different colors, too many swirls. And when you think about it, why is the center circle off-center?

Update: The company announced that the old familiar logo will still appear on all MasterCard credit cards around the world. The new logo, on the other hand, will serve as a business platform to connect with their customers, merchants & shareholders through all their communication channels.

4. Seattle’s Best

Seattle’s Best began roasting coffee in the 70s, creating premium US coffee and setting the bar for American coffee culture. It has grown from a modest coffee shop in Seattle, Washington and multiplied to a thousand stores in the US and worldwide. It’s the second largest chain of coffee stores after Starbucks (Seattle’s Best is a subsidiary of Starbucks).

I like the old logo–it looks traditional, yes, but in a good way: it is vintage, cozy and homey; like a home away from home. That’s what I believe a coffee shop should be. Maybe the execs thought the logo is too old-fashioned, detailed and fussy. Seattle’s Best probably wanted to compete with other more accessible and affordable coffees like McCafe and Dunkin’ Donuts. They wanted a logo that is simple, minimalist and clean.

However, they seem to have gone too extreme with their simplicity. At first look, it looks striking–there is good design visually. Great typography, gray border with visually relaxing white space. It looks generic and boring. I’m confused whether they’re serving coffee, or eyedrop products, or mineral water, or house cleaning products. Seattle’s Best maybe the most unusual logo for a coffee shop; if it works for them or not, we have to wait and see.

5. AOL

AOL is now Aol. With a dot. Using a Helvetica font (or a variant of it). It’s an attempt at rebranding to be fresh and hip. Was it successful? Far from it.

CEO Tony Armstrong said their new identity is ‘dynamic’, in time with the website’s move to become a more content-centric and provide a world-class experience to their consumers.

First is their questionable use of font. I used to love Helvetica. It was labeled as the best font created in the 20th century, and has received much admiration and praise in the design industry. But over the years I have grown to dislike the font, just as I have an aversion to Comic Sans. Why? While I appreciate the genius behind the typeface design, it’s always in danger of looking tacky and ineffective–because it’s so overused. Their use of Helvetica is a sign of poor creativity and research.

Aol changes their logo background almost everyday, like Google changes for special holidays. It didn’t do much however–the backgrounds used were cliché and corny.

Aol was one of the first online companies established. For years it has been seen by users as a dinosaur, and has been overtaken by newcomers (Google, Yahoo!) in terms of success. It’s great that they’re starting to do something about it, but Aol’s attempts to rebrand themselves as youthful and fun are off-key. It’s lame, and they’re obviously trying too hard.

Hope you enjoyed this article and you learned what some do’s and don’ts.

If you are looking for more logo design tips and logo inspiration, check out these two articles:

Share in comment section what is the biggest lesson you learned from this successful and bad logos article! Maybe you have more good or bad logo design tips to share?

Editorial Team

Written by Editorial Team

  • Nik

    No. 11. It’s ‘couldn’t care less’ not, ‘could care less’, because that means the opposite of what you are trying to convey, and sounds retarded.

  • Google “WCW Logo 1999.” At least most of these logos are eligible and have appealing shapes to them.

  • Bonnie

    Great article, examples and commentary! It’s always amazing to see how large companies with so many resources can settle on such unfortunate designs… I heart cum too…. :) and the MasterCard logo is muddy looking and puzzling – did the designer not know how to even use an align tool?

    • Dainis Graveris

      Hey Bonnie, right? :) Well, why not have fun and learn from other people mistakes at the same time? :))

  • You can also check some logo design samples done by me here : http://www.semanticflow.com/portfolio/#logo

  • Borse

    ng back on font weight doesn’t make a logo any better in most cases.

  • Mukesh

    Nice article .. and brain on writer ;)

  • Huda

    Interesting article !

  • simeon

    most of these logos are sexual in nature. i wonder if they knew what they were drawing?

  • nicola

    The NSW government logo features the Waratah, an Australian native flower and an iconic symbol for Australians.

  • Tony Kelsey

    Great article. I truly laughed out loud over some of them (and your comments, Jamal). The Comprehensive Health Care logo is just plain funny. The others…hideous and absurd! Thanks for putting this together.

  • Mamun

    Well, I think we all can agree these are terrible, but they should of picked an author who’s logo pieces are not equal/worse than in this article. tnx Jamal

  • Vlad

    nice post,
    London Olympics, i really don’t get the meaning before

  • Cory

    I think we all can agree these are terrible, but they should of picked an author who’s logo pieces are not equal/worse than in this article.

    • Jamal

      Hi Cory, thanks for reading my article. Well actually my portfolio is pretty outdated because I don’t have the free time to put a consistent amount of time behind its redesign, thus the entries are rather old from when I first got into design. You would’ve noticed that if you paid attention to the year the work is associated with.

      • Cory

        Fair enough, but it’d be wise to act soon to avoid mis-representation of your skill. I apologize if my previous comment came across as rude.

        • Jamal

          Yeah I am actually in the sketching phase of my new portfolio design. Its okay, as long as you didn’t mean any intentional harm and enjoyed the comic relief in this article there is no hard feelings. Personally, I would’ve felt rude if I didn’t take the time to respond to someone that took the time to read one of my articles.

  • mackson

    Wow! nice and such a interesting post.. I like to share this post with my friends who are also designer and it may help him to get idea about logo designing.

  • Morgan

    This is hilarious. A lot of them seem to suggest strange things. Great read and comic relief.

  • Gene Gee

    At least I didn’t see any misspelled words in the logo’s, unlike the writers use of the word “Your” instead of the proper “You’re” on number 25.

    Those who live in glass houses…

    • Bob

      Did anyone else find it funny that Gene’s complaint about the author’s spelling included using logo’s instead of logos?

      • Bob

        Wait, wait, and the use of “the authors” instead of “author’s?” Gene, dude, clean the glass walls of your house. And no, I don’t care if I have typos in my post. And yes, you can start a sentence with “And.” Your English teacher lied to you.

  • Jamal

    Hi Alex and Mick,

    Let me first thank you both for taking the time to read the article I have written and for commenting. Now Alex, the title of the article states that this is showcasing the worst logos. This means that yeah you might see some of the entries here on other sites, however because we are showcasing the worst those entries can’t be ignored just because they were on another websites blog article. Do you understand my point?

    Mick, I guess I’ll just tell you why the logos you think are good deserve to be on this list. Let’s start with the NSW logo. Now I’m not from New South Wales, Australia so I can’t talk about this too much. The cultural differences between my country of residence America, and New South Wales, Australia are distinct despite minimal similarities. The problem with this logo is that the font for one. It is strong and bold, much like a government should be, however it is clashing style wise with the flower in my opinion. In addition, the S should be centered under the flower.

    If you read what I wrote about the MSN logo then you would know I didn’t bash the logo in general, just this rendition MSN made. The typography here is awful, and a big step in the wrong direction compared to its older one. Cutting back on font weight doesn’t make a logo any better in most cases.

    The A-Style logo still looks, like well, what it looks like. I completely understand the gorilla marketing approach used here, and how the shock value, I guess is a good word, sparked this company from just being a logo into something more and respect it. However it doesn’t change the fact that it looks like, well, what it looks like.

    • Adam

      But how does that reflect your statement about the NSW Government logo – “Now this is definitely the logo of a governing body I can trust.” Surely, the misalignment of the ‘S’ and your opinion of the font does not immediately make NSW Government ‘distrustful’.

      • Dainis Graveris

        I guess the point Adam is..can it be improved? Does it really convey the right message?

        • Adam

          I think the NSW Government logo reflects the position of the body as being the ‘Heart of NSW’ as evident with the use of the Waratah, a flower which is protected by law in Australia and has been used since 1962 as the state’s floral emblem. The flower actually represents something far more than it meets the eye. It pays respect to the indigenous Aboriginals in Australia and has a long history in NSW (of which you can easily find on the internet). The logo is simplistic and easy to recognise and remember and easily visible by its red colour.

          • Dainis Graveris

            Didnt know that, Adam. Thank you for educating :)

  • rakib

    So much pedophilia certainly deserves an honorable mention!

    • Trent

      Good stuff mate, thats the hardest I laughed all day ! Keep up the good word !

  • I doubt this should be posted under the “Inspiration” category, or even posted at all.

  • Mick

    Agreed, plus there’s some really odd ones in there as well, NSW Government? MSN? What?? And does he realise the A-Style one was intended to look like that—it is actually rather cleaver.
    But it’s nice that the blogger read two or three “bad logo” themed blogs and adopted them for his own. Terribile work.

  • TS

    is ‘endrun’ supposed to be Paul Rand’s enron logo? for one thing that is just gaudy and the colors are not quite the original.

  • Jeremy Hawes

    Wow, I think the London Olympics was my favorite for the ‘non-perverted’ category. These are definitely some of the worst logo designs I’ve seen.

  • bdb

    American Pediatric Center gets my vote, but I do disagree on Portland Trail Blazers logo. I like the logo and I like the way team interprets it.

    • Jamal


      The Trail Blazers logo is here for a few reasons: 1) An NBA logo is something the teams fans should rally around, and find easy to. Most of the Trail Blazer fans at one point or another have mentioned they get confused about exactly what it means. 2) It doesn’t leave direct interpretation for mascot. Much like the Lakers, who have a fine logo, the Trail Blazers had to get creative with their teams mascot because their logo and name didn’t directly dictate one. However, a cat is not what comes to my mind as an animal for representing a Trail Blazer. Maybe a cheetah.

  • Dave

    Locum and London Olympics get my vote, although so much pedophilia certainly deserves an honorable mention!